Critique of an evaluation of software for searching MEDLINE.

TitleCritique of an evaluation of software for searching MEDLINE.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication1993
AuthorsBleich HL
JournalProc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care
Pagination591-5
Date Published1993
ISSN0195-4210
KeywordsBias, Evaluation Studies as Topic, MEDLINE, Research Design, Software, User-Computer Interface
Abstract

In a previous study, investigators at McMaster University compared 14 ways to search the MEDLINE database and concluded that the method that cost the least (the National Library of Medicine's ELHILL program) yielded the highest proportion of relevant articles, whereas the method that cost the most (PaperChase) yielded the least. There are serious defects in the study design that invalidate the authors' conclusions.

Alternate JournalProc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care
PubMed ID8130543
PubMed Central IDPMC2850645